![Samsung's 860 EVO SSD, 970 EVO Plus, 980 Pro, 850 EVO Basic, Seagate, Intel 660P, and Ironwolf 256MB (HDD) compared – ISG Siegen Samsung's 860 EVO SSD, 970 EVO Plus, 980 Pro, 850 EVO Basic, Seagate, Intel 660P, and Ironwolf 256MB (HDD) compared – ISG Siegen](https://isg.beel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/image.png)
Samsung's 860 EVO SSD, 970 EVO Plus, 980 Pro, 850 EVO Basic, Seagate, Intel 660P, and Ironwolf 256MB (HDD) compared – ISG Siegen
![Mixed Read/Write Performance - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND Mixed Read/Write Performance - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND](https://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph13761/sustained-rm.png)
Mixed Read/Write Performance - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND
![Mixed Read/Write Performance - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND Mixed Read/Write Performance - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND](https://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph13761/sustained-sm.png)
Mixed Read/Write Performance - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND
![SLC Cache Sizes & SYSmark 2018 - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND SLC Cache Sizes & SYSmark 2018 - The Samsung 970 EVO Plus (250GB, 1TB) NVMe SSD Review: 92-Layer 3D NAND](http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph13761/fill-last16.png)